Erfolgreich durch internationale Zusammenarbeit

Psychiatry and Mental Health

Cite as: Archiv EuroMedica. 2026. 16; 4. DOI 10.35630/2026/16/Iss.4.02

Received 10 July 2026;
Accepted 07 August 2026;
Published 14 August 2026

SOCIAL MEDIA AND MENTAL HEALTH SELF-DIAGNOSIS: RISKS, BENEFITS, AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR ADOLESCENTS AND YOUNG PEOPLE

Bogna Błachowska¹ , Wojciech Frączyk² ,
Agata Świątek³ , Kamil Andruszkiewicz² ,
Bartosz Machnio⁴ , Natalia Jasińska⁵ ,
Mateusz Krysiak² , Natalia Turzyńska² ,
Katarzyna Mania² , Julia Bąk² ,
Agnieszka Stankowska²

¹ St. Vincent de Paul Hospital, Gdynia, Poland
² University Clinical Centre in Gdańsk, Poland
³ St. Adalbert Hospital, Gdańsk, Poland
⁴ Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
⁵ 7th Naval Hospital, Gdańsk, Poland

download article (pdf)

  bognaspamowe@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Background

Adolescents increasingly use social media platforms, including TikTok, Instagram, and Reddit, to obtain information about mental health and psychiatric disorders. Such content may facilitate mental health literacy, validation, and help seeking, but may also expose users to misinformation, oversimplified diagnostic narratives, and algorithmically reinforced content.

Aim

To examine the potential benefits and risks of mental health self-diagnosis through social media among adolescents and young people, with particular attention to clinical, developmental, ethical, and systemic implications.

Materials and Methods

A narrative review of literature published primarily between 2020 and 2026 was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar. The search included terms related to social media, mental health, self-diagnosis, adolescents, TikTok, Instagram, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, help seeking behaviour, and digital health literacy. Systematic reviews, meta analyses, observational studies, qualitative studies, clinical studies, and policy publications were considered.

Results

The identified factors included limited access to professional care, the search for explanations of personal experiences, the need for support, and exposure to algorithmically recommended content. In one content analysis, 52% of the 100 most viewed ADHD related TikTok videos were classified as misleading, and fewer than 50% of the claims were consistent with DSM 5 criteria. Social media may improve access to information and encourage help seeking, but inaccurate or oversimplified content may contribute to misinterpretation of symptoms and premature adoption of diagnostic labels. The available evidence is heterogeneous and generally does not permit causal conclusions.

Conclusions

Mental health content on social media may support awareness, validation, and help seeking, but it may also encourage inaccurate or overly simplified self-diagnosis. Clinical responses should acknowledge adolescents’ concerns while maintaining comprehensive diagnostic assessment and avoiding premature diagnostic labeling. Further longitudinal and intervention studies are required to determine the effects of social media based self diagnosis on clinical outcomes, identity development, and help seeking.

Keywords: self-diagnosis; social media; adolescent mental health; misinformation; digital health literacy; help seeking behaviour

INTRODUCTION

Adolescence is a critical developmental period during which most psychiatric disorders first emerge. Analyses of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 indicate that 15.2% of 10–19-year-olds worldwide have at least one diagnosable mental disorder, with anxiety (4.9%), conduct disorder (2.7%), ADHD (2.6%), and depression (2.4%) being most prevalent [1]. More than 346 million individuals under 24 were estimated to live with at least one mental disorder in 2021, onset peaking at ~15 years [2], and age-standardized global prevalence in this group rose by 6.8% between 1990 and 2021 [3]. US autism diagnoses increased markedly between 2011 and 2022, particularly among young adults and females [4], with parallel upward trends for diagnosed ADHD over a 20-year period [5]; comparable increases in ADHD and autism have been documented in the United Kingdom between 2003 and 2018, largely attributed to greater awareness and improved detection rather than to underlying aetiology [6].

Concurrent with these trends, adolescents' digital engagement has expanded. Approximately 95% of US youth aged 13–17 use at least one social media platform—YouTube (91%), Snapchat (87%), Instagram (84%), and TikTok (82%) predominating [7]—and adolescents spend on average ~3 hours per day on social media [8]. Earlier estimates documented 1 hour and 11 minutes of social media use per day among 13–18-year-olds and 7 hours and 22 minutes of daily screen use among 8–18-year-olds, 16% of which was on social media [9, 10]. Social media has become an increasingly important source of mental health information: in a 2025 pilot study, every adolescent entering treatment for mood or anxiety disorders had viewed mental health content online before first clinical contact [11], and earlier work found that 81% of young people with newly diagnosed mood or anxiety disorders had searched online about their symptoms, with an average gap exceeding 91 weeks before first in-person help-seeking [12].

Defining psychiatric self-diagnosis

Following Fellowes, psychiatric self-diagnosis refers to the process by which individuals diagnose themselves rather than relying on official diagnosticians [13]. It must be distinguished from adjacent processes:

• Information seeking — accessing content to learn about a topic, often of general interest, without applying it personally.
• Self-screening — using validated tools (e.g., PHQ-9, GAD-7, Autism Spectrum Quotient) to estimate the probability that a disorder is present, yielding a probabilistic output rather than a diagnostic label.
• Suspicion — recognizing that one's experiences resemble a diagnostic description, without arriving at a stable conclusion about one's own status.
• Self-diagnosis — in the sense used here, arriving at and adopting a specific diagnostic label as a personal identity, integrating social media content, peer testimonials, and one's own biographical narrative.

Conflating these phenomena obscures the prevalence and clinical consequences of self-diagnosis.

Why adolescents turn to social media

Short-form video platforms prioritize brevity and personal narratives: content analyses indicate that 52% of the 100 most-viewed ADHD-related TikTok videos were misleading, with fewer than 50% of claims aligning with DSM-5 criteria, and that professional content was more accurate than non-clinician content [14, 15]. Algorithmic feedback loops amplify diagnostic content, while community platforms such as Reddit provide anonymous spaces where users compare experiences and negotiate diagnostic identities [16]. Reduced third-party fact-checking across Meta-owned platforms in 2025 further limits oversight on the platforms adolescents use most.

Multiple overlapping drivers shape adolescent engagement. Access is central: in the United States, the ratio of child and adolescent psychiatrists averages approximately 14 per 100,000 children, with 70% of US counties having none [17, 18]. Long waiting lists, financial barriers, and confidentiality concerns—particularly parental involvement, identified by school-aged adolescents as the most common help-seeking barrier [19]—push adolescents toward free, immediate, anonymous online resources. Adolescence is also a sensitive period for identity formation [20], and a diagnostic label can organize diffuse personal experiences and secure peer validation; for marginalized groups, including LGBTQ+ youth, such language offers a shared vocabulary for previously invalidated experiences [16].

Benefits, risks, and gaps

Improved mental health literacy has been linked in a meta-analysis to stronger help-seeking intentions among young people [21], and platform-based mental health campaigns can increase public engagement and help-seeking behaviour [22]. For adolescents in underserved settings, online information may be the only entry point into mental health discourse, and online communities can reduce isolation [22]. These benefits coexist, however, with documented risks. The substantial proportion of inaccurate content on major platforms raises concern that adolescents may adopt labels without adequate clinical verification, leading to misinterpretation of symptoms, premature diagnostic closure, and internalized stigma—self-diagnosed individuals report higher negative self-image and internalized stigma than their clinically diagnosed counterparts [23]. Qualitative analyses indicate that adopting a diagnostic label can become self-reinforcing, shaping subsequent symptom perception [16], and pre-formed impressions may complicate the clinical encounter.

Evidence specifically addressing adolescent psychiatric self-diagnosis through social media—as distinct from general social media use—remains limited. Engagement with mental health content is nearly universal among adolescents entering psychiatric care [11], and substantial proportions of diagnostic content on major platforms do not meet professional accuracy standards [14, 15, 24]; self-diagnostic reasoning is consistently documented among adults and post-secondary students [16, 25]. However, the literature has yet to operationalize psychiatric self-diagnosis in a way that distinguishes it from information seeking, self-screening, and suspicion in adolescent populations. Longitudinal evidence linking exposure, self-diagnostic conclusions, and clinical outcomes is scarce, available studies frequently combine adolescents with young adults [16, 25], and causation between social media exposure and self-diagnosis cannot be inferred from current designs.

AIM

The aim of this narrative review is to examine mental health self diagnosis through social media among adolescents and young people.

Objectives

1. To identify the main factors associated with the use of social media for mental health information and self-diagnosis.
2. To summarize the potential benefits and risks of social media based self-diagnosis.
3. To discuss its clinical implications and possible responses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review draws from multiple systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials, and qualitative studies published primarily between 2020 and 2026, with emphasis on high-quality evidence including Cochrane reviews, randomized controlled trials, and large-scale observational studies when experimental data were unavailable. Literature searches were conducted across major databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar using keywords related to social media, mental health, self-diagnosis, adolescents, TikTok, Instagram, ADHD, autism, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, help-seeking behavior, and digital health literacy. The review synthesizes evidence across multiple domains—prevalence and mechanisms of self-diagnosis, clinical implications, impact on the therapeutic encounter, evidence-based interventions, ethical considerations, and future directions—to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding this emerging phenomenon. Unlike systematic reviews that employ rigid inclusion/exclusion criteria and quantitative synthesis, this narrative review offers a broad, contextual analysis designed to inform clinical practice, guide policy development, and identify critical research gaps in an rapidly evolving area where adolescent mental health intersects with digital technology. The approach prioritizes clinical relevance and practical applicability while maintaining scientific rigor through transparent literature selection and balanced presentation of both benefits and risks associated with psychiatric self-diagnosis via social media.

RESULTS

Characteristics of Social Media Mental Health Content

Social media platforms are heterogeneous in structure, user base, and dominant content type, and these differences shape adolescents' exposure to mental health information. In the Multidimensional Model of Social Media Use, social media is described along three dimensions—activities (e.g., directed communication, active posting, passive browsing), motives for use (e.g., enhancement or compensation), and communication partners (e.g., strong or weak ties)—a framework that applies across age groups rather than being adolescent-specific [26]. Video-based platforms and information- or opinion-based platforms (X) encourage consumption of content predominantly from strangers (weak ties; passive consumption), whereas community-based platforms are designed for the creation of and interaction with content from both personal networks and strangers [26]. Understanding these differences is essential when assessing the possibilities of psychiatric mimicry, self-diagnosis, and pre-existing bias.

In an adolescent sample (youth entering psychiatric treatment for mood and anxiety disorders), Armstrong et al. reported that all participants had viewed mental-health content online, with social media sites more commonly consulted than any academic source [11]. Excessive short-form video viewing has been shown to influence inattention symptoms negatively in Chinese adolescents, and inattention symptoms, experiences of being bullied, and school anxiety mediated the relationship between excessive viewing and school refusal behaviours in this population [27]. Among US adolescents, Instagram and TikTok use were associated with depressive symptoms, while the effect was not observed for Snapchat, Facebook, or X [28]. Greater time spent on social media was associated with more internalizing and externalizing problems in a US youth sample, and repeated cross-sectional youth surveys between 2022 and 2024 linked social media use to disordered eating, with effects differing by gender and sexual orientation [29, 30]. A systematic narrative review of children and adolescents documented consistent associations between social media use and depression and anxiety symptoms, although the age range is broader and causal direction cannot be established [31].

TikTok is an algorithm-driven short-form video platform; Instagram emphasises visual content; Facebook promotes interactivity; and Reddit is a community-based discussion forum where most users are anonymous. Meta, which owns both Instagram and Facebook, cancelled third-party fact-checking in 2025, meaning that the majority of statements made on these platforms are no longer externally verified.

A common feature across these platforms is the presence of content creators ("influencers") whose psychiatric expertise ranges from qualified clinicians to lived-experience advocates, with corresponding variation in content quality. In a cross-sectional analysis of the 100 most-viewed TikTok videos about ADHD, 52% were classified as misleading, fewer than 50% of claims aligned with DSM-5 criteria, and video quality was higher for healthcare-professional uploads than for non-clinician uploads, with non-clinicians uploading the majority of misleading content [14, 15]. Algorithmic recommendation systematically biased content toward certain conditions: TikTok content tagged with both #mentalhealthdiagnosis and #mentalhealthselfdiagnosis focused predominantly on ADHD and autism compared with other conditions [24], and greater frequency of watching ADHD-related videos was associated with viewers estimating higher ADHD prevalence and with the platform recommending lower-quality videos, in a self-reinforcing pattern [14].

The correlation between frequent social media use and body-image concerns and disordered eating has been established in several meta-analyses predominantly of adolescents and young female adults; platform-specific patterns within this domain remain underdeveloped [32–34].

Table 1 summarizes the principal studies discussed in this review, highlighting their design, populations or platforms, and key findings.

Factors Associated with Self-Diagnosis

Approximately one in seven (14.3%) 10–19-year-olds worldwide experience mental health problems and these conditions remain largely unrecognized and untreated. With the ratio of child and adolescent psychiatrists in the United States averaging 14 per 100,000 children and concentrated mainly in metropolitan areas [18], and 70% of US counties having no child psychiatrist at all [40], professional psychiatric care remains highly inaccessible. Self-diagnosis may function as a way of bridging this access gap to self-understanding.

Findings from adolescent samples
Privacy and confidentiality concerns were the most commonly reported barrier to help-seeking among school-age adolescents who wanted psychiatric support: 72.3% of students did not want their parents to know, and parental involvement was the foremost concern [19]. Adolescence is a sensitive period for the formation of identity and social competence, particularly affective responses to social acceptance and rejection [20]. Mental health diagnostic language can offer a shared vocabulary for personal experiences, especially among marginalised groups including LGBTQ+ youth, and can facilitate self-understanding and validation [24]. Social media can also provide support, community, and access to mental health resources for individuals in need [22]. The algorithmic nature of content delivery on these platforms generates echo chambers, and peer-generated content is often highly relatable and easily digestible; quantifiable feedback (likes, shares, comments) supplies validation to those seeking it.

Findings from adult Reddit users, post-secondary students, and broader samples
Financial barriers to professional care, particularly in countries without government-funded healthcare systems, and long wait times for clinical assessment were commonly discussed in a qualitative study of adult Reddit users discussing self-diagnosis [16]. Because these data derive from adult Reddit users rather than adolescents, the findings cannot be directly generalized to adolescents. A scoping review documented the adoption of mental health labels through social media among post-secondary students, and its conclusions are therefore restricted to that population [39].

Potential Benefits and Risks

Self-diagnosis through social media can be both helpful and harmful.

Findings from adolescent samples
Every adolescent entering psychiatric treatment for mood or anxiety disorders in the Armstrong pilot study had viewed mental-health content online prior to first clinical contact, and engagement with mental health TikTok has been framed as a potential public health tool for youth [11, 41]. Diagnostic language can offer adolescents fundamentals for understanding their experiences and can facilitate validation, particularly for marginalised groups including LGBTQ+ and neurodivergent youth [14, 24]. Brief detox interventions have demonstrated efficacy in adolescents: a one-week social media abstention significantly reduced disordered eating behaviours by 16% in adolescent girls and reduced depression, anxiety, and insomnia in adolescents and young adults, particularly among those with higher baseline severity [21, 28, 35]. Among adolescents with identified ADHD, identity perception has been associated with symptom severity and quality of life [38], and problematic short-form video viewing, inattention, experiences of being bullied, and school anxiety formed a mediation chain leading to school refusal behaviours in this population [27].

Risks are nonetheless substantial among adolescents. In the same cross-sectional study cited in 3.1, 52% of the top 100 ADHD-related TikTok videos were misleading, with fewer than 50% of claims aligning with DSM-5 criteria [14, 15]. Exposure to harmful content promoting suicide, self-harm, and disordered eating can magnify these risks during a developmental period characterised by heightened sensitivity to social comparison and validation [24, 27, 42].

Findings from adult Reddit users, post-secondary students, and broader samples
Self-diagnosed individuals on r/ADHD—predominantly adult Reddit users—reported significantly higher negative self-image and internalized stigma than their clinically diagnosed peers; these findings relate to adults and post-secondary students on the platform and cannot be directly generalized to adolescents [23]. Among the same adult Reddit population, qualitative analysis documented psychiatric mimicry as a phenomenon in which symptoms can spread through social exposure and create a self-reinforcing process whereby individuals adopt symptoms they observe online [24, 43]. In a broader commentary, the potential "erasure of credibility"—where legitimate concerns face dismissal ("now no one is believed")—has been raised in general and adult-leaning policy discussion [24, 27, 42, 44]. ADHD and autism dominate self-diagnosis discourse in post-secondary and adult-leaning samples, with online representations potentially blurring diagnostic boundaries [23]. Problematic social media use correlates with depressive and anxiety symptoms across age groups and may involve bidirectional relationships that create reinforcing cycles, particularly in girls [22]. Social comparison in social media correlates strongly with body-image concerns in meta-analytic evidence drawn predominantly from young female adults; these findings cannot be directly generalized to adolescents [32–34]. Mental health literacy in young people was linked in meta-analysis to stronger intentions to seek professional help, although this measure is not adolescent-specific [21], and a systematic review of mental health campaigns delivered through social media reported increases in engagement and help-seeking across heterogeneous populations [22].

These data describe associations and cannot determine whether exposure to mental health content causes adolescents or adults to develop self-diagnostic conclusions, or whether individuals already experiencing distress are differentially drawn to such content.

Table 2 summarizes the principal potential benefits and risks identified in the reviewed literature.

Clinical Implications and Responses

Findings from adolescent samples
Adolescents arrive at clinical encounters with pre-formed diagnostic impressions, and the value they place on a diagnosis correlates with the frequency of viewing mental health content online [11, 19]. Diagnostic challenges in this population include distinguishing genuine symptoms from learned presentations, separating psychiatric mimicry from authentic presentation, and managing confirmation bias from algorithmic echo chambers [24, 31, 43, 45]. Managing disappointment when a self-diagnosis is not confirmed requires sensitivity, as adolescents may experience alternative clinical conclusions as invalidating [45]. The therapeutic relationship must balance validation of distress with diagnostic accuracy; dismissing the self-diagnosis without acknowledging underlying suffering risks alienating adolescent patients [29].

Clinicians working with adolescents should routinely inquire about social media use and online health-information seeking, approach self-diagnosis with curiosity rather than scepticism, and create therapeutic environments where adolescents feel heard while receiving comprehensive assessment and evidence-based treatment. Recommended practices include validation of distress and self-understanding efforts, education about diagnostic processes and the limitations of social media content, involvement of adolescents in collaborative decision-making, teaching of critical appraisal of online health information, and clear communication of confidentiality protections [32, 46]. Cognitive-behavioural approaches that teach healthy social-media engagement have proved more effective than complete restriction in adolescent populations [31]; family-based approaches, including media plans, co-viewing, and open communication, represent evidence-based harm-reduction strategies applicable to this group [30]. Mindfulness and self-compassion interventions have been shown to reduce body-image concerns and depressive symptoms in adolescents [35].

Findings from adult Reddit users, post-secondary students, and broader samples
Among adult Reddit users, the concept of "erasure of credibility" describes cycles in which legitimate concerns face dismissal when self-diagnosis is disbelieved [44]. The presentation of psychiatric conditions in simplified online terms that do not capture overlap or comorbidity has been described in commentary that draws on general and adult-leaning sources [27, 42].

Systemic recommendations emerging from the broader literature include platform accountability through content regulation and algorithm transparency [16, 35]; professional engagement with clinicians creating evidence-based content; school-based mental health literacy curricula; improved access to professional care addressing the root causes of self-diagnosis; and research priorities including longitudinal studies, intervention trials, and equity-focused investigations [16, 35].

Ethical Considerations

Psychiatric self-diagnosis raises ethical issues concerning autonomy, diagnostic labels, and access to information.

Findings from adolescent samples
Adolescence represents a transitional stage in the development of medical decision-making capacity, creating tensions between respecting emerging autonomy and providing appropriate guidance. Confidentiality rights differ across jurisdictions; in adolescent populations, 50.3% of those wanting psychiatric support specifically did not want parents to know, highlighting the clinical significance of privacy protections [19, 29]. When confidential care is inaccessible, adolescents may rely more heavily on social media, potentially increasing self-diagnostic risks.

Diagnostic labelling involves weighing competing benefits and harms: a label can facilitate self-understanding and social identification while also threatening self-concept and creating stigmatization [45]. Diagnostic over-identification predicted lower quality of life more strongly than symptom severity itself in adolescents with ADHD [38]. How a diagnosis is communicated matters: clinicians should acknowledge strengths, emphasise growth potential, avoid deterministic language, and situate diagnosis as one aspect of complex personhood. Adolescents largely conceptualise psychological problems in non-pathological terms; self-labelling with psychiatric terms is comparatively uncommon in this group, suggesting that social media amplifies diagnostic thinking beyond adolescents' natural inclinations [39].

Findings from adult, post-secondary, and broader samples. Information-equity concerns arise from digital divides that affect the quality of access: adolescents and young people with fewer professional care resources may also have less access to reliable online information. Digital health literacy—the ability to find, evaluate, and use online health information—correlates with educational and socioeconomic advantages, and misinformation disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, including racial and ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ youth, and rural adolescents [16, 23]. Content intended for these audiences must be multilingual, culturally responsive, accessible, and representative of diverse experiences.

DISCUSSION

The available evidence indicates that mental health self-diagnosis through social media may have both supportive and adverse consequences for adolescents and young people. Social media may improve access to mental health information, provide validation, and encourage help seeking, particularly among individuals who face barriers to professional care. At the same time, the quality of online content is inconsistent, and simplified or inaccurate descriptions of psychiatric disorders may contribute to misunderstanding of symptoms and diagnostic criteria [16, 24, 43].

The evidence specifically addressing self-diagnosis remains limited. Available studies indicate that adolescents and young people frequently encounter mental health content online [11]. Studies of ADHD related content have also identified a high proportion of misleading information [14, 15]. However, exposure to mental health content, recognition of personal symptoms, use of screening tools, suspected diagnosis, and adoption of a diagnostic identity are distinct phenomena and should not be interpreted as equivalent.

Studies examining general social media use report associations with depressive symptoms, anxiety, body image concerns, and disordered eating [25, 28, 29, 31, 32, 34, 45]. These findings provide relevant context but do not directly establish the effects of psychiatric self-diagnosis. Most available studies are observational, cross sectional, qualitative, or based on content analysis. Therefore, they cannot determine whether exposure to mental health content contributes to self-diagnosis or whether individuals already experiencing psychological distress are more likely to seek and engage with diagnostic content.

The clinical consequences of social media based self-diagnosis remain insufficiently studied. Online diagnostic narratives may help some individuals describe their experiences and initiate help seeking, but they may also contribute to fixed assumptions about the nature of their symptoms. This may complicate clinical assessment when online descriptions do not correspond to diagnostic criteria or when similar symptoms may arise from different psychiatric, developmental, or medical conditions. Current evidence does not establish whether social media based self-diagnosis improves or worsens treatment engagement, diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, or long term identity development.

The available literature also has limited population specificity. Some included studies concern adolescents, whereas others examine young adults, university students, adult social media users, or populations with broad age ranges. Findings from adult Reddit users and post secondary students cannot be directly generalized to adolescents [16, 39]. Differences between platforms, types of content, patterns of use, psychiatric conditions, and study designs further limit direct comparison between studies.

Future research should clearly distinguish exposure to mental health content from self screening, suspected diagnosis, and adoption of a diagnostic identity. Longitudinal studies are needed to examine temporal relationships between online content exposure, self-diagnosis, professional assessment, treatment engagement, and clinical outcomes. Intervention studies should evaluate digital health literacy, clinical communication strategies, and approaches intended to reduce misinformation while preserving access to reliable mental health information.

Limitations

This narrative review has several limitations. The process of selecting publications was not based on a fully reproducible search strategy, and no formal assessment of study quality or risk of bias was performed. The included evidence was heterogeneous with respect to study design, population, age range, social media platform, type of mental health content, and psychiatric condition.

Some included studies examined adolescents, whereas others involved young adults, university students, adult social media users, or mixed age populations. Therefore, not all findings can be directly generalized to adolescents. The review also combined studies of psychiatric self-diagnosis with broader research on social media use, mental health symptoms, body image, eating disorders, and help seeking. These related areas provide important context but do not directly measure self-diagnosis.

Most available studies were cross sectional, qualitative, observational, or based on analysis of online content. This limits causal interpretation and does not allow firm conclusions regarding the effects of social media based self-diagnosis on diagnostic accuracy, treatment engagement, clinical outcomes, or identity development. Rapid changes in social media platforms, algorithms, and content may also reduce the applicability of older findings to current patterns of use.

CONCLUSION

The review identified the main factors associated with adolescents’ and young people’s use of social media for mental health information, including limited access to professional care, the need to explain personal experiences, the search for support, and exposure to algorithmically recommended content.

The analysis showed that social media may contribute to greater mental health awareness, access to support, and professional help seeking. At the same time, inaccurate or oversimplified content may lead to misinterpretation of symptoms, premature adoption of diagnostic labels, internalized stigma, and fixed expectations regarding a particular diagnosis.

The clinical significance of online self-diagnosis remains insufficiently studied. When working with adolescents, clinicians should consider the information and beliefs they have acquired through social media while maintaining comprehensive diagnostic assessment and critically discussing the limitations of online content. Strengthening digital health literacy, improving access to reliable information, and expanding access to professional mental health services may help reduce the risks associated with social media–based self-diagnosis.

Further longitudinal and intervention studies are needed to clarify the prevalence, clinical consequences, and long-term impact of psychiatric self-diagnosis through social media among adolescents and young people.

DISCLOSURE

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Bogna Błachowska, Kamil Andruszkiewicz, Agata Świątek. Methodology: Bogna Błachowska, Mateusz Krysiak. Formal Analysis: Julia Bąk, Agata Świątek. Investigation: Natalia Jasińska, Bartosz Machnio. Data Curation: Mateusz Krysiak, Wojciech Frączyk, Natalia Turzyńska. Validation: Natalia Turzyńska, Katarzyna Mania. Resources: Agnieszka Stankowska, Katarzyna Mania. Visualization: Bogna Błachowska, Agnieszka Stankowska. Writing, Original Draft Preparation: Bogna Błachowska, Natalia Jasińska. Writing, Review and Editing: Kamil Andruszkiewicz, Julia Bąk, Wojciech Frączyk. Project Administration: Bogna Błachowska.

All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved its final version for publication.

AI Use

Artificial intelligence tools were used solely to support English language editing and improve the clarity and grammatical accuracy of the manuscript. All scientific content, interpretation of the literature, and conclusions were reviewed and approved by the authors. AI tools were not used to select studies, extract data, assess evidence, or formulate scientific conclusions.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

REFERENCES

1. Castaldelli-Maia JM, Ventriglio A, Torales J. The global prevalence of mental disorders among adolescents: focus on sex, regional and socio-demographic differences. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2025;37(6–7):570–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2025.2573752
2. Liu W, Zhang Y, Chen J, Li X, Huang Y, Zhao F, et al. Global burden and trends of major mental disorders in individuals under 24 years of age from 1990 to 2021, with projections to 2050: insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1635801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1635801
3. Xu JJ, Ding LY, Sun CC, Qiao Y, Wang MT, Zheng JX, et al. The burden of mental disorders, substance use disorders, and self-harm among youths globally: findings from the 2021 Global Burden of Disease Study. Transl Psychiatry. 2025;15(1):346. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03533-x
4. Grosvenor LP, Croen LA, Lynch FL, Marafino BJ, Maye M, Penfold RB, et al. Autism diagnosis among US children and adults, 2011–2022. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(10):e2442218. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42218
5. Xu G, Strathearn L, Liu B, Yang B, Bao W. Twenty-year trends in diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among US children and adolescents, 1997–2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(4):e181471. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1471
6. Cybulski L, Ashcroft DM, Carr MJ, Garg S, Chew-Graham CA, Kapur N, et al. Temporal trends in annual incidence rates for psychiatric disorders and self-harm among children and adolescents in the UK, 2003–2018. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):229. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03235-w
7. Al-Jbouri E, Volk AA, Spadafora N, Andrews NCZ. Friends, followers, peers, and posts: adolescents’ in-person and online friendship networks and social media use influences on friendship closeness via the importance of technology for social connection. Front Dev Psychol. 2024;2:1419756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdpys.2024.1419756
8. Virós-Martín C, Montaña-Blasco M, Jiménez-Morales M. Can’t stop scrolling! Adolescents’ patterns of TikTok use and digital well-being self-perception. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024;11(1):1444. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03984-5
9. Subrahmanyam K, Michikyan M. Methodological and conceptual issues in digital media research. In: Nesi J, Telzer EH, Prinstein MJ, editors. Handbook of adolescent digital media use and mental health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. p. 9–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108976237.003
10. Rideout V, Peebles A, Mann S, Robb MB. The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens, 2021 [Internet]. San Francisco: Common Sense Media; 2022 [cited 2026 Aug 2]. Available from: https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-common-sense-census-media-use-by-tweens-and-teens-2021
11. Armstrong S, Osuch E, Wammes M, Chevalier O, Kieffer S, Meddaoui M, et al. Self-diagnosis in the age of social media: a pilot study of youth entering mental health treatment for mood and anxiety disorders. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025;256:105015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105015
12. Van Meter AR, Birnbaum ML, Rizvi A, Kane JM. Online help-seeking prior to diagnosis: can web-based resources reduce the duration of untreated mood disorders in young people? J Affect Disord. 2019;252:130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.019
13. Fellowes S. Establishing the accuracy of self-diagnosis in psychiatry. Philos Psychol. 2025;38(6):2542–2569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2327823
14. Karasavva V, Miller C, Groves N, Montiel A, Canu W, Mikami A. A double-edged hashtag: evaluation of #ADHD-related TikTok content and its associations with perceptions of ADHD. PLoS One. 2025;20(3):e0319335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319335
15. Yeung A, Ng E, Abi-Jaoude E. TikTok and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional study of social media content quality. Can J Psychiatry. 2022;67(12):899–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437221082854
16. Underhill R, Foulkes L. Self-diagnosis of mental disorders: a qualitative study of attitudes on Reddit. Qual Health Res. 2025;35(7):779–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241288785
17. McBain RK, Cantor JH, Kofner A, Stein BD, Yu H. Ongoing disparities in digital and in-person access to child psychiatric services in the United States. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022;61(7):926–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2021.11.028
18. Findling RL, Stepanova E. The workforce shortage of child and adolescent psychiatrists: is it time for a different approach? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57(5):300–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.02.008
19. Fazel M, Soneson E, Parker M, Newby D, Herring J. Adolescent consent and Generation Alpha: bridging policy, practice and empirical evidence in healthcare. Br J Psychiatry. 2025 Dec 15:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10488
20. Dahl RE, Allen NB, Wilbrecht L, Suleiman AB. Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective. Nature. 2018;554(7693):441–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25770
21. Özparlak A, Karakaya D, Özer Z. The association of mental health literacy with mental well-being and help-seeking in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Nurs. 2023;73:e243–e250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2023.09.017
22. Draganidis A, Fernando AN, West ML, Sharp G. Social media delivered mental health campaigns and public service announcements: a systematic literature review of public engagement and help-seeking behaviours. Soc Sci Med. 2024;359:117231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117231
23. Zhang X, Oh YJ, Zhang Y, Zhu J. Seeking validation in the digital age: the impact of validation seeking on self-image and internalized stigma among self- versus clinically diagnosed individuals on r/ADHD. PLoS One. 2025;20(10):e0331856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331856
24. Ju R, Field-Springer K, Liu Z, Chandler E. #MentalHealthDiagnosis and self-diagnosis: harmful or helpful on TikTok. Health Commun. 2026 Apr 1:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2026.2652419
25. Singh B, Zhou M, Curtis R, Maher C, Dumuid D. Social media use and well-being across adolescent development. JAMA Pediatr. 2026;180(3):288–297. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.5619
26. Yang CC, Holden SM, Ariati J. Social media and psychological well-being among youth: the multidimensional model of social media use. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2021;24(3):631–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-021-00359-z
27. Du Y, Wang J, Wang Z, Liu J, Li S, Lv J, et al. Severity of inattention symptoms, experiences of being bullied, and school anxiety as mediators in the association between excessive short-form video viewing and school refusal behaviors in adolescents. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1450935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1450935
28. Gentzler AL, Hughes JL, Johnston M, Alderson JE. Which social media platforms matter and for whom? Examining moderators of links between adolescents’ social media use and depressive symptoms. J Adolesc. 2023;95(8):1725–1748. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12243
29. Delgado-Ron JA, Whitehead J, Kaufmann J, Wu J, de Arruda Maluf G, Dhaliwal H, et al. Gender and sexual orientation differences in the relationship between social media use and disordered eating: results from a serial cross-sectional youth survey from 2022 to 2024. J Adolesc Health. 2026;78(1):110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.08.022
30. Riehm KE, Feder KA, Tormohlen KN, Crum RM, Young AS, Green KM, et al. Associations between time spent using social media and internalizing and externalizing problems among US youth. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(12):1266–1273. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2325
31. Saleem N, Young P, Yousuf S. Exploring the relationship between social media use and symptoms of depression and anxiety among children and adolescents: a systematic narrative review. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2024;27(11):771–797. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0456
32. Bonfanti RC, Melchiori F, Teti A, Albano G, Raffard S, Rodgers R, et al. The association between social comparison in social media, body image concerns and eating disorder symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Body Image. 2025;52:101841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101841
33. Saiphoo AN, Vahedi Z. A meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media use and body image disturbance. Comput Human Behav. 2019;101:259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.028
34. de Valle MK, Gallego-García M, Williamson P, Wade TD. Social media, body image, and the question of causation: meta-analyses of experimental and longitudinal evidence. Body Image. 2021;39:276–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.10.001
35. Calvert E, Cipriani M, Dwyer B, Lisowski V, Mikkelson J, Chen K, et al. Social media detox and youth mental health. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(11):e2545245. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.45245
36. Nagata JM, Hur JO, Talebloo J, Lee S, Choi WW, Kim SJ, et al. Problematic social media use interventions for mental health outcomes in adolescents. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2025;27(9):491–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-025-01619-3
37. O’Connor C, Kadianaki I, Maunder K, McNicholas F. How does psychiatric diagnosis affect young people’s self-concept and social identity? A systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature. Soc Sci Med. 2018;212:94–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.011
38. Stern A, Lamash L. Associations between identity perception, symptom severity, and quality of life in adolescents with ADHD. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):42762. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26963-5
39. Alexander ED, Sarmiento I, Chung VHA, Yacovelli A, Andersson N. Post-secondary student adoption of mental health labels through their use of social media: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2026;16(2):e107379. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107379
40. McBain RK, Kofner A, Stein BD, Cantor JH, Vogt WB, Yu H. Growth and distribution of child psychiatrists in the United States: 2007–2016. Pediatrics. 2019;144(6):e20191576. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1576
41. Chochol MD, Gandhi K, Elmaghraby R, Croarkin PE. Harnessing youth engagement with mental health TikTok and its potential as a public health tool. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023;62(7):710–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2022.11.015
42. Monteith S, Glenn T, Geddes JR, Whybrow PC, Achtyes ED, Bauer M. Implications of online self-diagnosis in psychiatry. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2024;57(2):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2268-5441
43. Rizwan B, Weigle PE. Paging Dr Influencer. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2025;72(2):267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2024.09.003
44. Weigle PE, Shafi RMA. Social media and youth mental health. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024;26(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-023-01478-w
45. Blanchard L, Conway-Moore K, Aguiar A, Önal F, Rutter H, Helleve A, et al. Associations between social media, adolescent mental health, and diet: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2023;24(Suppl 2):e13631. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13631
46. Mohsenpour MA, Karamizadeh M, Barati-Boldaji R, Ferns GA, Akbarzadeh M. Structural equation modeling of direct and indirect associations of social media addiction with eating behavior in adolescents and young adults. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3044. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29961-7

back